1982 Mitsubishi Sapporo vs. 1996 Acura TL
To start off, 1996 Acura TL is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mitsubishi Sapporo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mitsubishi Sapporo would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1982 Mitsubishi Sapporo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Mitsubishi Sapporo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Acura TL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Acura TL has automatic transmission and 1982 Mitsubishi Sapporo has manual transmission. 1982 Mitsubishi Sapporo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Acura TL will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Mitsubishi Sapporo | 1996 Acura TL | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Acura |
Model | Sapporo | TL |
Year Released | 1982 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1797 cc | 3200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 200 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4864 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1786 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1405 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2840 mm |