1982 Mitsubishi Sapporo vs. 2004 Proton Juara
To start off, 2004 Proton Juara is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mitsubishi Sapporo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mitsubishi Sapporo would be higher. At 1,797 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Mitsubishi Sapporo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Mitsubishi Sapporo weights approximately 50 kg more than 2004 Proton Juara.
Because 1982 Mitsubishi Sapporo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Mitsubishi Sapporo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Proton Juara, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2004 Proton Juara has automatic transmission and 1982 Mitsubishi Sapporo has manual transmission. 1982 Mitsubishi Sapporo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Proton Juara will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Mitsubishi Sapporo | 2004 Proton Juara | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Proton |
Model | Sapporo | Juara |
Year Released | 1982 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1797 cc | 1094 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 70 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1055 kg | 1005 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2400 mm |