1982 Mitsubishi Sapporo vs. 2010 Hyundai Elantra
To start off, 2010 Hyundai Elantra is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mitsubishi Sapporo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mitsubishi Sapporo would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Hyundai Elantra is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Hyundai Elantra weights approximately 191 kg more than 1982 Mitsubishi Sapporo.
Because 1982 Mitsubishi Sapporo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Mitsubishi Sapporo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Hyundai Elantra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Hyundai Elantra has automatic transmission and 1982 Mitsubishi Sapporo has manual transmission. 1982 Mitsubishi Sapporo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Hyundai Elantra will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Mitsubishi Sapporo | 2010 Hyundai Elantra | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Hyundai |
Model | Sapporo | Elantra |
Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1797 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 132 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1055 kg | 1246 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4506 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1775 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1481 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2649 mm |