1982 Mitsubishi Sapporo vs. 2011 Porsche 911

To start off, 2011 Porsche 911 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mitsubishi Sapporo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mitsubishi Sapporo would be higher. At 3,800 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Porsche 911 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Porsche 911 weights approximately 485 kg more than 1982 Mitsubishi Sapporo.

Because 2011 Porsche 911 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Mitsubishi Sapporo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Porsche 911 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1982 Mitsubishi Sapporo 2011 Porsche 911
Make Mitsubishi Porsche
Model Sapporo 911
Year Released 1982 2011
Engine Position Front Rear
Engine Size 1797 cc 3800 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line boxer
Horse Power 0 HP 385 HP
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear AWD
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1055 kg 1540 kg
Vehicle Length 4440 mm 4460 mm
Vehicle Width 1680 mm 1852 mm
Vehicle Height 1340 mm 1300 mm
Wheelbase Size 2520 mm 2350 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]