1982 Mitsubishi Sapporo vs. 2011 Toyota Sequoia
To start off, 2011 Toyota Sequoia is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mitsubishi Sapporo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mitsubishi Sapporo would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Toyota Sequoia is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Toyota Sequoia weights approximately 1544 kg more than 1982 Mitsubishi Sapporo.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2011 Toyota Sequoia has automatic transmission and 1982 Mitsubishi Sapporo has manual transmission. 1982 Mitsubishi Sapporo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Toyota Sequoia will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Mitsubishi Sapporo | 2011 Toyota Sequoia | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Toyota |
| Model | Sapporo | Sequoia |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1797 cc | 5700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 381 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1055 kg | 2599 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 5210 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 2029 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1956 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 3099 mm |
