1982 Mitsubishi Sapporo vs. 2012 Daewoo Matiz
To start off, 2012 Daewoo Matiz is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mitsubishi Sapporo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mitsubishi Sapporo would be higher. At 1,797 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Mitsubishi Sapporo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Mitsubishi Sapporo weights approximately 204 kg more than 2012 Daewoo Matiz.
Because 1982 Mitsubishi Sapporo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Mitsubishi Sapporo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Daewoo Matiz, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Mitsubishi Sapporo | 2012 Daewoo Matiz | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Daewoo |
| Model | Sapporo | Matiz |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1797 cc | 794 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 50 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Top Speed | 224 km/hour | 144 km/hour |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 9.2 seconds | 17 seconds |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1055 kg | 851 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1500 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2350 mm |
