1982 Mitsubishi Sigma vs. 1963 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,597 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma (75 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma should accelerate faster than 1963 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 55 kg more than 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma.
Let's talk about torque, 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma (117 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma | 1963 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Nissan |
| Model | Sigma | Cedric |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1597 cc | 1488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 75 HP | 60 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 117 Nm | 115 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1085 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2540 mm |
