1982 Mitsubishi Sigma vs. 1964 Skoda 1202
To start off, 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Skoda 1202. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Skoda 1202 would be higher. At 1,597 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1964 Skoda 1202. (45 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma should accelerate faster than 1964 Skoda 1202. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Skoda 1202 weights approximately 35 kg more than 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma (118 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Skoda 1202. (86 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Skoda 1202.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Mitsubishi Sigma | 1964 Skoda 1202 | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Skoda |
Model | Sigma | 1202 |
Year Released | 1982 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1597 cc | 1221 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 45 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 118 Nm | 86 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1070 kg | 1105 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1590 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2690 mm |