1982 Mitsubishi Sigma vs. 1982 Zastava 102
To start off, both 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma and 1982 Zastava 102 were released in the same year (1982). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 1,597 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma weights approximately 300 kg more than 1982 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma (118 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma | 1982 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Zastava |
| Model | Sigma | 102 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1982 |
| Engine Size | 1597 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 118 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1070 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2160 mm |
