1982 Mitsubishi Sigma vs. 1984 Mitsubishi Sigma
To start off, 1984 Mitsubishi Sigma is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma would be higher. Both 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma and 1984 Mitsubishi Sigma are equipped with a 1,597 cc engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Mitsubishi Sigma (90 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1984 Mitsubishi Sigma should accelerate faster than 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 118 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma | 1984 Mitsubishi Sigma | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Sigma | Sigma |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1984 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1597 cc | 1597 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 90 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 118 Nm | 118 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1070 kg | 1070 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2520 mm |
