1982 Mitsubishi Sigma vs. 1986 Opel Ascona
To start off, 1986 Opel Ascona is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma would be higher. At 1,597 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1986 Opel Ascona. (74 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma should accelerate faster than 1986 Opel Ascona. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma weights approximately 150 kg more than 1986 Opel Ascona. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma (118 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Opel Ascona. (101 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Opel Ascona.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Mitsubishi Sigma | 1986 Opel Ascona | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Opel |
Model | Sigma | Ascona |
Year Released | 1982 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1597 cc | 1297 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 118 Nm | 101 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1070 kg | 920 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2580 mm |