1982 Mitsubishi Sigma vs. 1998 Rover Mini

To start off, 1998 Rover Mini is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma would be higher. At 1,597 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma (75 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1998 Rover Mini. (62 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma should accelerate faster than 1998 Rover Mini. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma weights approximately 334 kg more than 1998 Rover Mini. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Rover Mini, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma (117 Nm) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Rover Mini. (94 Nm). This means 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Rover Mini.

Compare all specifications: