1982 Mitsubishi Sigma vs. 2006 Opel Meriva
To start off, 2006 Opel Meriva is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma would be higher. At 1,685 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Opel Meriva is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Opel Meriva, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Mitsubishi Sigma | 2006 Opel Meriva | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Opel |
Model | Sigma | Meriva |
Year Released | 1982 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1597 cc | 1685 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 75 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1790 mm |