1982 Mitsubishi Sigma vs. 2013 Subaru Outback
To start off, 2013 Subaru Outback is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma would be higher. At 2,500 cc (16 cylinders), 2013 Subaru Outback is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Subaru Outback (171 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Subaru Outback should accelerate faster than 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Subaru Outback weights approximately 486 kg more than 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Subaru Outback is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Subaru Outback (236 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 118 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma. (118 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2013 Subaru Outback will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma. 2013 Subaru Outback has automatic transmission and 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma has manual transmission. 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Subaru Outback will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma | 2013 Subaru Outback | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Subaru |
| Model | Sigma | Outback |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1597 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 16 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 171 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 118 Nm | 236 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4100 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed shiftable automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1070 kg | 1556 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4800 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 2050 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1670 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2740 mm |
