1982 Mitsubishi Starion vs. 2001 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2001 Toyota Celica is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mitsubishi Starion. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mitsubishi Starion would be higher. At 2,555 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Mitsubishi Starion is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Toyota Celica (190 HP) has 45 more horse power than 1982 Mitsubishi Starion. (145 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1982 Mitsubishi Starion.
Because 1982 Mitsubishi Starion is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Mitsubishi Starion. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Toyota Celica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Mitsubishi Starion (251 Nm) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Toyota Celica. (180 Nm). This means 1982 Mitsubishi Starion will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Mitsubishi Starion | 2001 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Toyota |
Model | Starion | Celica |
Year Released | 1982 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2555 cc | 1797 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 145 HP | 190 HP |
Torque | 251 Nm | 180 Nm |
Top Speed | 193 km/hour | 225 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |