1982 Monteverdi Sierra vs. 2010 Holden Epica
To start off, 2010 Holden Epica is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Monteverdi Sierra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Monteverdi Sierra would be higher. At 5,210 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Monteverdi Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Monteverdi Sierra (150 HP) has 2 more horse power than 2010 Holden Epica. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Monteverdi Sierra should accelerate faster than 2010 Holden Epica.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Monteverdi Sierra | 2010 Holden Epica | |
| Make | Monteverdi | Holden |
| Model | Sierra | Epica |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5210 cc | 1991 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 148 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Vehicle Length | 4890 mm | 4805 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2700 mm |
