1982 Monteverdi Sierra vs. 2010 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2010 Volvo XC60 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Monteverdi Sierra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Monteverdi Sierra would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Monteverdi Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Volvo XC60 (281 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 1982 Monteverdi Sierra. (187 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Volvo XC60 should accelerate faster than 1982 Monteverdi Sierra.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Monteverdi Sierra | 2010 Volvo XC60 | |
| Make | Monteverdi | Volvo |
| Model | Sierra | XC60 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5898 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 187 HP | 281 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4628 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2774 mm |
