1982 Monteverdi Tiara vs. 2006 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2006 Smart ForTwo is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Monteverdi Tiara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Monteverdi Tiara would be higher. At 3,837 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Monteverdi Tiara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Monteverdi Tiara (201 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 141 more horse power than 2006 Smart ForTwo. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Monteverdi Tiara should accelerate faster than 2006 Smart ForTwo.
Because 2006 Smart ForTwo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Smart ForTwo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Monteverdi Tiara, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1982 Monteverdi Tiara has automatic transmission and 2006 Smart ForTwo has manual transmission. 2006 Smart ForTwo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1982 Monteverdi Tiara will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Monteverdi Tiara | 2006 Smart ForTwo | |
| Make | Monteverdi | Smart |
| Model | Tiara | ForTwo |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 3837 cc | 698 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 201 HP | 60 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Top Speed | 235 km/hour | 135 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 2510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3080 mm | 1820 mm |
