1982 Nissan Bluebird vs. 1965 Riley 4
To start off, 1982 Nissan Bluebird is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Riley 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Riley 4 would be higher. At 1,952 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Nissan Bluebird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Nissan Bluebird (94 HP) has 27 more horse power than 1965 Riley 4. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Nissan Bluebird should accelerate faster than 1965 Riley 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Riley 4 weights approximately 18 kg more than 1982 Nissan Bluebird.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Nissan Bluebird (152 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Riley 4. (121 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1982 Nissan Bluebird will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Riley 4.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Nissan Bluebird | 1965 Riley 4 | |
Make | Nissan | Riley |
Model | Bluebird | 4 |
Year Released | 1982 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1952 cc | 1620 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 152 Nm | 121 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1130 kg | 1148 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2530 mm |