1982 Nissan Bluebird vs. 2010 Land Rover Freelander

To start off, 2010 Land Rover Freelander is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 2,179 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Land Rover Freelander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Land Rover Freelander (158 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 1982 Nissan Bluebird. (94 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Land Rover Freelander should accelerate faster than 1982 Nissan Bluebird.

Because 1982 Nissan Bluebird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Nissan Bluebird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Land Rover Freelander, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Land Rover Freelander (400 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 248 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Nissan Bluebird. (152 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2010 Land Rover Freelander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Nissan Bluebird.

Compare all specifications:

1982 Nissan Bluebird 2010 Land Rover Freelander
Make Nissan Land Rover
Model Bluebird Freelander
Year Released 1982 2010
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1952 cc 2179 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 94 HP 158 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 152 Nm 400 Nm
Torque RPM 3200 RPM 2000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Length 4430 mm 4510 mm
Vehicle Width 1660 mm 1750 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1930 mm
Wheelbase Size 2530 mm 2670 mm