1982 Nissan Cherry vs. 2010 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2010 Mazda Tribute is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Nissan Cherry. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Nissan Cherry would be higher. At 2,483 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda Tribute is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda Tribute weights approximately 350 kg more than 1982 Nissan Cherry.
Because 2010 Mazda Tribute is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Nissan Cherry. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda Tribute will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Nissan Cherry | 2010 Mazda Tribute | |
Make | Nissan | Mazda |
Model | Cherry | Tribute |
Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 986 cc | 2483 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 153 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 775 kg | 1125 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3900 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2400 mm | 2630 mm |