1982 Nissan Leopard vs. 2006 Acura CSX
To start off, 2006 Acura CSX is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Nissan Leopard. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Nissan Leopard would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Acura CSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Acura CSX (197 HP) has 100 more horse power than 1982 Nissan Leopard. (97 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Acura CSX should accelerate faster than 1982 Nissan Leopard. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Acura CSX weights approximately 208 kg more than 1982 Nissan Leopard. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1982 Nissan Leopard is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Nissan Leopard. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Acura CSX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Nissan Leopard | 2006 Acura CSX | |
Make | Nissan | Acura |
Model | Leopard | CSX |
Year Released | 1982 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1770 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 197 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1105 kg | 1313 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4544 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1752 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1435 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2700 mm |