1982 Nissan Leopard vs. 2008 Toyota RunX
To start off, 2008 Toyota RunX is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Nissan Leopard. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Nissan Leopard would be higher. At 1,770 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Nissan Leopard is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Nissan Leopard weights approximately 5 kg more than 2008 Toyota RunX.
Because 1982 Nissan Leopard is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Nissan Leopard. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Toyota RunX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Nissan Leopard (148 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Toyota RunX. (127 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 1982 Nissan Leopard will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Toyota RunX.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Nissan Leopard | 2008 Toyota RunX | |
Make | Nissan | Toyota |
Model | Leopard | RunX |
Year Released | 1982 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1770 cc | 1397 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 148 Nm | 127 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1105 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2610 mm |