1982 Nissan Prairie vs. 2006 Rover 25
To start off, 2006 Rover 25 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Nissan Prairie. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Nissan Prairie would be higher. At 1,809 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Nissan Prairie is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Nissan Prairie (89 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 2006 Rover 25. (83 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Nissan Prairie should accelerate faster than 2006 Rover 25. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Rover 25 weights approximately 25 kg more than 1982 Nissan Prairie.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Nissan Prairie (150 Nm @ 3700 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Rover 25. (110 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1982 Nissan Prairie will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Rover 25.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Nissan Prairie | 2006 Rover 25 | |
| Make | Nissan | Rover |
| Model | Prairie | 25 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2006 |
| Engine Size | 1809 cc | 1396 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 83 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 150 Nm | 110 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1060 kg | 1085 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2510 mm |
