1982 Nissan Pulsar vs. 1972 Triumph Spitfire
To start off, 1982 Nissan Pulsar is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Triumph Spitfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Triumph Spitfire would be higher. At 1,488 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Nissan Pulsar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Nissan Pulsar (70 HP) has 23 more horse power than 1972 Triumph Spitfire. (47 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Nissan Pulsar should accelerate faster than 1972 Triumph Spitfire. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Nissan Pulsar weights approximately 85 kg more than 1972 Triumph Spitfire. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1982 Nissan Pulsar (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Triumph Spitfire. (83 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 1982 Nissan Pulsar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Triumph Spitfire.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Nissan Pulsar | 1972 Triumph Spitfire | |
| Make | Nissan | Triumph |
| Model | Pulsar | Spitfire |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1488 cc | 1296 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 47 HP |
| Torque | 115 Nm | 83 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2900 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 865 kg | 780 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 3790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1210 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2110 mm |
