1982 Nissan Pulsar vs. 1979 Renault 20
To start off, 1982 Nissan Pulsar is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Renault 20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Renault 20 would be higher. At 1,647 cc (4 cylinders), 1979 Renault 20 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Renault 20 weights approximately 320 kg more than 1982 Nissan Pulsar.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Nissan Pulsar | 1979 Renault 20 | |
| Make | Nissan | Renault |
| Model | Pulsar | 20 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1979 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1488 cc | 1647 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 865 kg | 1185 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2670 mm |
