1982 Nissan Pulsar vs. 1980 Toyota Corsa
To start off, 1982 Nissan Pulsar is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Toyota Corsa. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Toyota Corsa would be higher. At 1,488 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Nissan Pulsar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Nissan Pulsar (70 HP) has 2 more horse power than 1980 Toyota Corsa. (68 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Nissan Pulsar should accelerate faster than 1980 Toyota Corsa. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Nissan Pulsar weights approximately 50 kg more than 1980 Toyota Corsa. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 115 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Nissan Pulsar | 1980 Toyota Corsa | |
| Make | Nissan | Toyota |
| Model | Pulsar | Corsa |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1488 cc | 1452 cc |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 68 HP |
| Torque | 115 Nm | 115 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 865 kg | 815 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1560 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2510 mm |
