1982 Nissan Pulsar vs. 1983 Suzuki Alto
To start off, 1983 Suzuki Alto is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 1,488 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Nissan Pulsar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Nissan Pulsar (70 HP) has 31 more horse power than 1983 Suzuki Alto. (39 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Nissan Pulsar should accelerate faster than 1983 Suzuki Alto. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Nissan Pulsar weights approximately 255 kg more than 1983 Suzuki Alto. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Nissan Pulsar (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Suzuki Alto. (59 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1982 Nissan Pulsar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Suzuki Alto.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Nissan Pulsar | 1983 Suzuki Alto | |
| Make | Nissan | Suzuki |
| Model | Pulsar | Alto |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1488 cc | 796 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 39 HP |
| Torque | 115 Nm | 59 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 865 kg | 610 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 3300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1420 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2160 mm |
