1982 Nissan Pulsar vs. 1989 Peugeot 504
To start off, 1989 Peugeot 504 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 1,970 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Peugeot 504 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Peugeot 504 (100 HP) has 30 more horse power than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1989 Peugeot 504 should accelerate faster than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Peugeot 504 weights approximately 305 kg more than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1989 Peugeot 504 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Peugeot 504. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Nissan Pulsar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Nissan Pulsar | 1989 Peugeot 504 | |
Make | Nissan | Peugeot |
Model | Pulsar | 504 |
Year Released | 1982 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1488 cc | 1970 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 100 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 865 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2750 mm |