1982 Nissan Pulsar vs. 1996 Skoda Octavia

To start off, 1996 Skoda Octavia is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 1,896 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Skoda Octavia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Skoda Octavia (90 HP) has 20 more horse power than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Skoda Octavia should accelerate faster than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Skoda Octavia weights approximately 420 kg more than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Skoda Octavia (200 Nm @ 1900 RPM) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1996 Skoda Octavia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Nissan Pulsar.

Compare all specifications:

1982 Nissan Pulsar 1996 Skoda Octavia
Make Nissan Skoda
Model Pulsar Octavia
Year Released 1982 1996
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1488 cc 1896 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 70 HP 90 HP
Torque 115 Nm 200 Nm
Torque RPM 3200 RPM 1900 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 865 kg 1285 kg
Vehicle Length 3970 mm 4520 mm
Vehicle Width 1630 mm 1740 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1440 mm
Wheelbase Size 2420 mm 2520 mm