1982 Nissan Pulsar vs. 2004 Proton Gen-2
To start off, 2004 Proton Gen-2 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 1,597 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Proton Gen-2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Proton Gen-2 (109 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. (59 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Proton Gen-2 should accelerate faster than 1982 Nissan Pulsar.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Proton Gen-2 (148 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. (96 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2004 Proton Gen-2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Nissan Pulsar.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Nissan Pulsar | 2004 Proton Gen-2 | |
Make | Nissan | Proton |
Model | Pulsar | Gen-2 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2004 |
Engine Size | 1270 cc | 1597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 96 Nm | 148 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2610 mm |