1982 Nissan Pulsar vs. 2004 ZAZ Wagon
To start off, 2004 ZAZ Wagon is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 1,488 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Nissan Pulsar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Nissan Pulsar (70 HP) has 19 more horse power than 2004 ZAZ Wagon. (51 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Nissan Pulsar should accelerate faster than 2004 ZAZ Wagon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Nissan Pulsar weights approximately 120 kg more than 2004 ZAZ Wagon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Nissan Pulsar (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 ZAZ Wagon. (79 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1982 Nissan Pulsar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 ZAZ Wagon.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Nissan Pulsar | 2004 ZAZ Wagon | |
Make | Nissan | ZAZ |
Model | Pulsar | Wagon |
Year Released | 1982 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1488 cc | 1091 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 51 HP |
Torque | 115 Nm | 79 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 865 kg | 745 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 3830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2330 mm |