1982 Nissan Pulsar vs. 2005 Renault Clio

To start off, 2005 Renault Clio is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 1,488 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Nissan Pulsar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Renault Clio (96 HP) has 26 more horse power than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Renault Clio weights approximately 170 kg more than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Renault Clio (192 Nm @ 1900 RPM) has 77 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2005 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Nissan Pulsar.

Compare all specifications:

1982 Nissan Pulsar 2005 Renault Clio
Make Nissan Renault
Model Pulsar Clio
Year Released 1982 2005
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1488 cc 1461 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 70 HP 96 HP
Torque 115 Nm 192 Nm
Torque RPM 3200 RPM 1900 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 865 kg 1035 kg
Vehicle Length 3970 mm 3780 mm
Vehicle Width 1630 mm 1650 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1420 mm
Wheelbase Size 2420 mm 2570 mm