1982 Nissan Pulsar vs. 2008 Toyota Aygo
To start off, 2008 Toyota Aygo is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 1,488 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Nissan Pulsar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Nissan Pulsar (70 HP) has 17 more horse power than 2008 Toyota Aygo. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Nissan Pulsar should accelerate faster than 2008 Toyota Aygo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Toyota Aygo weights approximately 25 kg more than 1982 Nissan Pulsar.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Toyota Aygo (132 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2008 Toyota Aygo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Nissan Pulsar.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Nissan Pulsar | 2008 Toyota Aygo | |
Make | Nissan | Toyota |
Model | Pulsar | Aygo |
Year Released | 1982 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1488 cc | 1398 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 53 HP |
Torque | 115 Nm | 132 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 865 kg | 890 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 3405 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1615 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2340 mm |