1982 Nissan Pulsar vs. 2009 Renault Scenic

To start off, 2009 Renault Scenic is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 1,868 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Renault Scenic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Renault Scenic (118 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. (59 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Renault Scenic should accelerate faster than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Renault Scenic weights approximately 350 kg more than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Renault Scenic (300 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 204 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. (96 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2009 Renault Scenic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Nissan Pulsar.

Compare all specifications:

1982 Nissan Pulsar 2009 Renault Scenic
Make Nissan Renault
Model Pulsar Scenic
Year Released 1982 2009
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1270 cc 1868 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 59 HP 118 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 96 Nm 300 Nm
Torque RPM 3600 RPM 2000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 865 kg 1215 kg
Vehicle Length 3970 mm 4270 mm
Vehicle Width 1630 mm 1630 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1820 mm
Wheelbase Size 2420 mm 2690 mm