1982 Nissan Pulsar vs. 2010 Volkswagen Citi

To start off, 2010 Volkswagen Citi is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 1,488 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Nissan Pulsar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Volkswagen Citi (83 HP) has 13 more horse power than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Volkswagen Citi should accelerate faster than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volkswagen Citi weights approximately 359 kg more than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Volkswagen Citi (124 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2010 Volkswagen Citi will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Nissan Pulsar.

Compare all specifications:

1982 Nissan Pulsar 2010 Volkswagen Citi
Make Nissan Volkswagen
Model Pulsar Citi
Year Released 1982 2010
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1488 cc 1421 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 70 HP 83 HP
Torque 115 Nm 124 Nm
Torque RPM 3200 RPM 4400 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 865 kg 1224 kg
Vehicle Length 3970 mm 3820 mm
Vehicle Width 1630 mm 1400 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1620 mm
Wheelbase Size 2420 mm 2410 mm