1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 1954 Saab 94
To start off, 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Saab 94. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Saab 94 would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 976 kg more than 1954 Saab 94.
Because 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1954 Saab 94, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass has automatic transmission and 1954 Saab 94 has manual transmission. 1954 Saab 94 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 1954 Saab 94 | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Saab |
Model | Cutlass | 94 |
Year Released | 1982 | 1954 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3790 cc | 747 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 57 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 504 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5530 mm | 3490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1040 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2210 mm |