1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 1955 Oldsmobile 98
To start off, 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Oldsmobile 98. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Oldsmobile 98 would be higher. At 5,320 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Oldsmobile 98 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Oldsmobile 98 weights approximately 402 kg more than 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 1955 Oldsmobile 98 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Oldsmobile 98. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 1955 Oldsmobile 98 | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Oldsmobile |
Model | Cutlass | 98 |
Year Released | 1982 | 1955 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 5320 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 200 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1326 kg | 1728 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 5400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1990 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 3210 mm |