1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 1957 Triumph TR3
To start off, 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Triumph TR3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Triumph TR3 would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 555 kg more than 1957 Triumph TR3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass has automatic transmission and 1957 Triumph TR3 has manual transmission. 1957 Triumph TR3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 1957 Triumph TR3 | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | Triumph |
| Model | Cutlass | TR3 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1957 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3790 cc | 1991 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 95 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 925 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5530 mm | 3840 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1400 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1280 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2240 mm |
