1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 1966 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 2,260 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 566 kg more than 1966 Suzuki Fronte.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 1966 Suzuki Fronte | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Suzuki |
Model | Cutlass | Fronte |
Year Released | 1982 | 1966 |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 785 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 35 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1326 kg | 760 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 3880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2250 mm |