1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 1973 Reliant Rebel
To start off, 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Reliant Rebel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Reliant Rebel would be higher. At 2,260 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 751 kg more than 1973 Reliant Rebel.
Because 1973 Reliant Rebel is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Reliant Rebel. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 1973 Reliant Rebel | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | Reliant |
| Model | Cutlass | Rebel |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1973 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 701 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 31 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1326 kg | 575 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 3510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2270 mm |
