1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 1976 Toyota Crown
To start off, 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Toyota Crown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Toyota Crown would be higher. At 3,789 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 130 kg more than 1976 Toyota Crown.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass has automatic transmission and 1976 Toyota Crown has manual transmission. 1976 Toyota Crown will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 1976 Toyota Crown | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | Toyota |
| Model | Cutlass | Crown |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1976 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3789 cc | 1987 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 102 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1350 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2700 mm |
