1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 1980 Toyota Land Cruiser
To start off, 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Toyota Land Cruiser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Toyota Land Cruiser would be higher. At 4,230 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Toyota Land Cruiser is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Toyota Land Cruiser weights approximately 220 kg more than 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 1980 Toyota Land Cruiser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Toyota Land Cruiser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass has automatic transmission and 1980 Toyota Land Cruiser has manual transmission. 1980 Toyota Land Cruiser will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 1980 Toyota Land Cruiser | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Toyota |
Model | Cutlass | Land Cruiser |
Year Released | 1982 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3789 cc | 4230 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1700 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1980 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2290 mm |