1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 1988 Suzuki Alto
To start off, 1988 Suzuki Alto is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Suzuki Alto, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass has automatic transmission and 1988 Suzuki Alto has manual transmission. 1988 Suzuki Alto will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 1988 Suzuki Alto | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Suzuki |
Model | Cutlass | Alto |
Year Released | 1982 | 1988 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3790 cc | 547 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 38 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 3200 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1400 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2340 mm |