1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 1998 Samsung SM
To start off, 1998 Samsung SM is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 162 kg more than 1998 Samsung SM.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 1998 Samsung SM | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | Samsung |
| Model | Cutlass | SM |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1998 |
| Engine Size | 3790 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Vehicle Weight | 1482 kg | 1320 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2710 mm |
