1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 2000 Suzuki X90
To start off, 2000 Suzuki X90 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 380 kg more than 2000 Suzuki X90.
Because 2000 Suzuki X90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Suzuki X90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass has automatic transmission and 2000 Suzuki X90 has manual transmission. 2000 Suzuki X90 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 2000 Suzuki X90 | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | Suzuki |
| Model | Cutlass | X90 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3790 cc | 1590 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 97 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5530 mm | 3720 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2210 mm |
