1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 2002 Subaru Outback
To start off, 2002 Subaru Outback is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Subaru Outback weights approximately 8 kg more than 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 2002 Subaru Outback is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 2002 Subaru Outback | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Subaru |
Model | Cutlass | Outback |
Year Released | 1982 | 2002 |
Body Type | Coupe | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3790 cc | 2457 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 154 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1482 kg | 1490 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2660 mm |