1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 2003 Proton Juara
To start off, 2003 Proton Juara is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,789 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 475 kg more than 2003 Proton Juara.
Because 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Proton Juara, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 2003 Proton Juara | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Proton |
Model | Cutlass | Juara |
Year Released | 1982 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3789 cc | 1094 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 70 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1005 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2400 mm |