1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 2004 Suzuki Wagon R+

To start off, 2004 Suzuki Wagon R+ is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,260 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 321 kg more than 2004 Suzuki Wagon R+.

Because 2004 Suzuki Wagon R+ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Suzuki Wagon R+ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass 2004 Suzuki Wagon R+
Make Oldsmobile Suzuki
Model Cutlass Wagon R+
Year Released 1982 2004
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2260 cc 1298 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 0 HP 93 HP
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front 4WD
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Vehicle Weight 1326 kg 1005 kg
Vehicle Length 4850 mm 3420 mm
Vehicle Width 1780 mm 1580 mm
Wheelbase Size 2680 mm 2340 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]