1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 2005 Smart Roadster
To start off, 2005 Smart Roadster is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,260 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2005 Smart Roadster is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Smart Roadster. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 2005 Smart Roadster | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Smart |
Model | Cutlass | Roadster |
Year Released | 1982 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 698 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 100 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 3430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2370 mm |